We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Edom November memorial recycling system
Details
Submitted by[?]: Cooperative Commonwealth Federation
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2106
Description[?]:
Lodamun's profitable recycling system shall be re-established immediately on the passage of this bill, and the recently-abolished recycling depots put back into operation. This shoudl prove a net benefit to the Lodamun taxpayer. The re-established recycling system shall be named in honour of Edom November, the first President-Councillor of Lodamun, renowned for his conservative economics and conservationist policies on the environment. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government-sponsored recycling programs.
Old value:: There is no national policy regarding recycled garbage.
Current: The government funds recycling facilities and enforces mandatory recycling for residents, commercial enterprise, and industry.
Proposed: The government funds recycling facilities for public use.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:12:37, September 02, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Edom November memorial recycling system |
Message | Back and forth, back and forth. Why not just leave it be for a while? |
Date | 17:23:09, September 02, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Edom November memorial recycling system |
Message | To ignore the environemental crisis would be a betrayal of those who voted for us: the environment, as the ASP well knows, is the very raison d'etre of this party. Lodamun had recycling in place for decades, and it is no fault of ours that the neo-liberals altered that efficient and profitable system. |
Date | 17:47:20, September 04, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Edom November memorial recycling system |
Message | as a gesture of compromise, we have changed the proposal to a more moderate option. |
Date | 05:08:27, September 05, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Edom November memorial recycling system |
Message | If you remember, we can support either no funding, or compulsory usage. What we can not justify is spending public money on something that people are not going to use. |
Date | 16:27:32, September 05, 2005 CET | From | Royal Conservative Party | To | Debating the Edom November memorial recycling system |
Message | ASP makes a good point with that last comment |
Date | 17:35:54, September 05, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Edom November memorial recycling system |
Message | RCP, would you support mandatory recycling then? The only reason we changed it to voluntary was in the hopes that it might meet with Conservative approval, since we already knew ASP & TIC would vote against whether we made it mandatory or voluntary. We are unclear as to your policy on the environment: is it conservationist, in which case we can continue making environmental proposals, or is it a do-nothing policy like the "libertarians"? We are attempting to find comon ground with your party in keeping with your offer of including Greens in your cabinet, but lack sufficient information on what your policies actually are on the environment. |
Date | 04:13:36, September 06, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Edom November memorial recycling system |
Message | GA, I was willing to support a shift earlier to compulsory funding for voluntary recycling facilities. ASP refused to support it, so we changed the bill to a full shift to "no policy". Usually we will follow the ASP on things where it is prudent and aligned with our policies. I dont know if this was before your time in Lodamun, but this debate happened during the environmental deregulation of the 80s. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 122 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 157 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 21 |
Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
Random quote: "Global warming, at least the modern nightmare vision, is a myth. I am sure of it and so are a growing number of scientists. But what is really worrying is that the world's politicians and policy makers are not." - David Bellamy |