We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Call for early elections, July 2510
Details
Submitted by[?]: Solentian People Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: March 2511
Description[?]:
| We, the People Party, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus. |
Proposals
Article 1
Arrange early elections as soon as this bill passes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:19:14, January 02, 2008 CET | From |  Solentian People Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, July 2510 |
| Message | Seats mssing, election needed. |
| Date | 04:27:52, January 03, 2008 CET | From | Federal Independent Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, July 2510 |
| Message | An election isn't needed every time seats are missing. It's just a way to mess up routine. |
| Date | 17:05:36, January 03, 2008 CET | From | Solentian People Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, July 2510 |
| Message | Its funny that you dont back elections when you have the Head of State yet do when your not isn't it FIP? |
| Date | 20:24:00, January 04, 2008 CET | From | Federal Independent Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, July 2510 |
| Message | If you do some research, you'll see that we've rarely supported call for early elections. Since around 2481, when the People Party arrived, we've voted on a total of 9 calls for early elections. We've voted yes once on the August 2493 call for early elections. Out of 9 times, we've voted no or have abstained 8, negating your claim that we support them for our own gain. Hardly seems that you are right here. Here they are for you: 1: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=151747 - Abstain 2: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=151890 - Abstain 3: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=151935 - No 4: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=152572 - No 5: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=158456 - Yes 6: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=160709 - Abstain 7: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=163217 - No 8: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=163439 - No 9: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=166422 - No Oh yes, the times we've voted No or Abstained have been mainly years where we didn't have the Supreme Presidency, defeating your claim we only block call for elections when we hold the Supreme Presidency. During that time, the last FIP Supreme President was Gregory Bieler who was ended his term on 2471. From 2471 until 2502, we did not hold the Supreme Presidency until Gary Verish won, which is when the majority of these calls were held. |
| Date | 20:43:24, January 04, 2008 CET | From | Solentian People Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, July 2510 |
| Message | Yes But when you didn't hold the presidency your little pals SRNP did and you wouldn't wish to go upsetting them now would you?? |
| Date | 20:48:04, January 04, 2008 CET | From | Solentian People Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, July 2510 |
| Message | Also another interesting fact is that on the 1 occasion you voted FOR an early election the party who held the presidency was my party. Yet all the times you vote against or abstain its you or the SRNP. Thats another funny thing isn't it and in that particular vote under question (EXample 5) the reason we were holding earlier elections proposed by your pals SRNP was because the CMP had left and you agreed seats needed filling, yet when a party leaves this time and many seats are vacant you disgaree, and that is why I find your actions hypocritical and ridiculous. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 121 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 118 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 168 |
| Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
| Random quote: "In public policy, it matters less who has the best arguments and more who gets heard, and by whom." - Ralph Reed |