We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2511
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kébé Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2512
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Kébé Front
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Kébé Front
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Holy Islamic Union
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Enlightened Cosmic Brotherhood
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Enlightened Cosmic Brotherhood
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Enlightened Cosmic Brotherhood
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Enlightened Cosmic Brotherhood
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Holy Islamic Union
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Kébé Front
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Holy Islamic Union
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Kébé Front
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Enlightened Cosmic Brotherhood
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Holy Islamic Union
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:34:30, January 04, 2008 CET | From | Civil Left-Wing Party of Al'Badara | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2511 |
| Message | No, we need a cabniet that will include everyone. One that fits the qualities of every party. |
| Date | 19:10:39, January 04, 2008 CET | From | Enlightened Cosmic Brotherhood | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2511 |
| Message | Logical. The people have voted for who they agree with. They do not agree with everyone. Therefore, not everyone needs to be included. That is foolishness. |
| Date | 23:39:46, January 04, 2008 CET | From | Civil Left-Wing Party of Al'Badara | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2511 |
| Message | I recieved 93 seats this past election. The Union of Logic lost 38 seats. Yes the UOL has more seats than we do, but you have to remeber the UOL has been here in the government for 30 elections and My party has only been here for 4 elctions. I think the people did speak through there votes, and not once has the UOL recieved more than 93 seats at one election. In one election we got 96. Everyone needs to be a part of the cabinet to make the proper descisons based on their beliefs. By the way, I used logic to write this. Thank you. |
| Date | 19:39:36, January 05, 2008 CET | From | Civil Left-Wing Party of Al'Badara | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2511 |
| Message | I would like to correct myself, on the previous debate post, my first sentence says: " recieved 93 seats this past election". What I meant to say, and the facts have told me, I recieved 96 seats. Thank You. By the way, UOL, we are waiting to see how your "brand of logic" responsed to my debate. If you think I did a good job and you were wrong and are willing to apologize, we will wait for it. Thanks again. |
| Date | 23:54:09, January 05, 2008 CET | From | Enlightened Cosmic Brotherhood | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2511 |
| Message | Illogical. Numerically, we are still superior. Lost seats, true. We cannot convince the moronic masses to vote for us every election. However, we still have more support statistically. Those who changed their votes are being delt with internally within the party. |
| Date | 04:20:14, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Civil Left-Wing Party of Al'Badara | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2511 |
| Message | Did you not read my complete response? Or did you forget to read? I said the only reason you have more seats currently, is because you were here longer than we have been. The point is, you claimed the people have voted with who they agree with, and I actually agree! The Union of Logic have never recieved 96 seats in one election, yet alone any number over 93. We got more seats than you did ever in one election, and while we were settling in our new seats, you lost 38! Logic is hard to understand, I don't expect you to understand yet. But logically you may have "more control" now, but I wouldn't call the people "moronic masses" if they vote against you, as we saw this past election. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 304 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 303 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 142 |
| Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting. |
| Random quote: "We are told that this is an odious and unpopular tax. I never knew a tax that was not odious and unpopular with the people who paid it." - John Sherman |