We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Energy (Nuclear Power) Amendment Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2512
Description[?]:
| An act to remove subsidies for nuclear power. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Current: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Proposed: The government does not take any position on nuclear power.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:06:04, January 04, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Energy (Nuclear Power) Amendment Act |
| Message | We currently subsidise nuclear power, to the detriment of other, cleaner sources of power. We should remove such subsidies, which will save the state money, and allow different power sources to be used. |
| Date | 01:34:04, January 04, 2008 CET | From | Tukarali Graenix Party | To | Debating the Energy (Nuclear Power) Amendment Act |
| Message | Leaning to support |
| Date | 04:12:59, January 04, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Energy (Nuclear Power) Amendment Act |
| Message | We'll oppose. |
| Date | 08:09:27, January 04, 2008 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the Energy (Nuclear Power) Amendment Act |
| Message | support as the first baby step to getting rid of nukes for good. |
| Date | 11:56:08, January 04, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Energy (Nuclear Power) Amendment Act |
| Message | This is not about nukes, that is, nuclear weapons. That is a completely separate issue. This is about nuclear power only. |
| Date | 20:47:35, January 05, 2008 CET | From | Monacelli Party | To | Debating the Energy (Nuclear Power) Amendment Act |
| Message | leaning to support. An increase in state money is a valid point. We are not outright banning it, but we are definitely providing a playing field of encouragement for other cleaner energy sources. |
| Date | 09:48:10, January 06, 2008 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the Energy (Nuclear Power) Amendment Act |
| Message | I mean get rid of BOTH nuclear power plants and nuke bombs. sorry if that was not clear. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 309 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 122 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols. |
| Random quote: "How many legs does a dog have if you call its tail a leg? Four. Calling a dog's tail a leg does not make it a leg." - Abraham Lincoln |