Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 00:10:07
Server time: 19:49:52, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): HawkDun | Vilnius | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: All-Leftist Cabinet Proposal of February 2511

Details

Submitted by[?]: Anarchistes pour une Société Libre

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2514

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet consisting of the five Leftist parties in Jelbania.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:59:23, January 04, 2008 CET
From Socialist Jelbanian Party-D.L.J.-D.L.F
ToDebating the All-Leftist Cabinet Proposal of February 2511
MessageWe would prefer a clear answer to our questions, before our support. We would support a cabinet with the PBN only if our conditions will be accepted.

1. Absolute and clear damnation of all the violent extremists of the PBN with consequent official expulsion from the party.

2.Dissolution of every armed organization or illegal formation linked with the PBN

3. Solemn and public promise of non-violence, freedom of speech for the rivals and respect for the actual system of democracy ( if you desire a change, this goal can be reached with popular consensus and not with weapons)

4. The acceptation of the High Treason act

This is the minimum for a cabinet party. Finally we would prefer another party at the head of government, as guarantor of peace and freedom...if the PBN will respect these few condition we'll support their candidature for HoG with pleasure in the future. We ask an evidence of good faith from the PBN.

Date23:52:43, January 04, 2008 CET
From Anarchistes pour une Société Libre
ToDebating the All-Leftist Cabinet Proposal of February 2511
Message1. This has already been done, please read our paper and statements more carefully.

2. Absolutely not. We protect our own. And expect others to do likewise.

3. We are Marxists, that is my answer.

4. The High Treason Act is a repressive and unconstitutional document, and is not recognized as law.

Date01:19:52, January 05, 2008 CET
From Centre Démocratique
ToDebating the All-Leftist Cabinet Proposal of February 2511
MessageClearly, PBN is an extremist party, unwilling to compromise with a good-natured party like the Socialists.

The dream of an all leftist cabinet is dead.

Date02:29:11, January 05, 2008 CET
From Démocrates de la Gauche
ToDebating the All-Leftist Cabinet Proposal of February 2511
MessageIt sounds like you are trying to suck up to the SJP there a little bit. Now you want cooperation with everyone else except the right I presume?

And how do you know?

Date09:43:58, January 05, 2008 CET
From Socialist Jelbanian Party-D.L.J.-D.L.F
ToDebating the All-Leftist Cabinet Proposal of February 2511
MessageThe problem is not the UCC. we can't form an alliance with a party that organize illegal formations and refuse peace and freedom of speech. The PBN is a marxist party? Well, we know many examples of important marxist parties ( like the PCI , the PCF , the PCE ) that accepted the democratic system , and we keep in great esteem their example. However we can't cooperate with a violent party and a wrong idea of marxism, a cabinet party should trust in the state, a cabinet party that refuse the current laws and the simple idea of freedom in his own country is simply a nonsense.

We have explained our conditions , the PBN have done the rest, not the UCC. Currently, we don't support this cabinet proposal.

Date20:16:17, January 05, 2008 CET
From Centre Démocratique
ToDebating the All-Leftist Cabinet Proposal of February 2511
MessageFriends don't have to "suck up" to each other.

Date22:59:19, January 05, 2008 CET
From Anarchistes pour une Société Libre
ToDebating the All-Leftist Cabinet Proposal of February 2511
MessageClearly, the Socialists do not understand what a Marxist is.

A Marxist, being a type of Socialist, is for the armed uprising of the working class to bring about an equal society.
A Reformist, also being a type of Socialist, is for the gradual transformation of society into socialism through democratic means. The SJP is clearly a Reformist Party, and the PBN is clearly a Marxist and revolutionary Party. Any Party that does not endorse revolution is not Marxist, this is simple and indisputable fact.

Date23:19:46, January 05, 2008 CET
From Socialist Jelbanian Party-D.L.J.-D.L.F
ToDebating the All-Leftist Cabinet Proposal of February 2511
MessageUnfortunately you are wrong. The european communists were all marxists and surely not reformists. The PCI and PCF surely were not "socialist" parties but pure communists, the best form of communism, euro-communism. However, if you want only an armed revolution , don't try to achieve power by cabinet proposals...it's surely too much bourgeois for you.

Date01:36:00, January 06, 2008 CET
From Démocrates de la Gauche
ToDebating the All-Leftist Cabinet Proposal of February 2511
MessageWhat they are trying to say PBN is that it is very possible to be competely communist and peaceful at the same time. We would be the first to support a strong coalition with your party if you abandon your extreme hardline communistic, (and in my opinion) stalinist ideology.

Date23:14:34, January 06, 2008 CET
From Anarchistes pour une Société Libre
ToDebating the All-Leftist Cabinet Proposal of February 2511
MessageWe are Marxist-Leninist Anti-Revisionist, therefore we support Mao and Stalin, as they were true Marxist-Leninists. Apparently, the SJP has not read enough theory, and does not fully understand the terms they use. A "communist" is simply someone who wishes to achieve a society where the workers control the means of production, and where everyone works as much as they can, and receives everything they need. That being said, both Marxists and Reformists are communists. That is, they both have the same goal in mind. They do, however, differ in the method in which they propose to move forwards into a fair and equal society.
I think my esteemed colleague from the SJP has some rather confused ideas on what a socialist is, and what a communist is. If I may recommend some reading material to further your knowledge of our movement, "Anarchism or Socialism?" by Comrade Stalin is a great place to start. Perhaps then we can talk about the differences in our two parties.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 177

no
    

Total Seats: 275

abstain
 

Total Seats: 49


Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players.

Random quote: "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 71