We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Glamorgan Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christian Action
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2516
Description[?]:
in the prevention of distractions and double entendres within armed forces. -Chancellor Eamon Lear (CNP)(2469) [[OOC Clarification, Homosexuals serve in the Women's Regiments, but since there is not an option for that within the bounds of the game mechanics banned seems the closest choice.]] |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Current: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Proposed: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women serve alongside men.
Current: Women can only serve in non-battle positions.
Proposed: Women serve in segregated units.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:17:27, January 05, 2008 CET | From | Cildanian Workers Coalition | To | Debating the Glamorgan Act |
Message | You are, of course, having a laugh? |
Date | 22:20:51, January 05, 2008 CET | From | Cildanian Workers Coalition | To | Debating the Glamorgan Act |
Message | The NA is *so* commited on Human rights that it sacrifices those of us that enjoy same sex relationships. ((OOC - quite frankly, even the OOC explination is offensive! )) |
Date | 02:16:15, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Christian Action | To | Debating the Glamorgan Act |
Message | The armed forces are Cildanias defense against trouble in times ahead and natures blights against us, there is no place in the military for personal relationships which place devotion to a single person over devotion to the service, nor is it a place illicit encounters of a less binding nature. Winston Glamorgan (2424-2511) penned this proposed article for the CNP following a series of scandals within the forces and was one of the key policies of New Action upon its founding. Although times have changed many New Action senators believes it holds greater importance in today's more morally liberated society than it did at its creation others see it as a fitting tribute to the man who fought for the moral reconstruction of our nation for fifty-three years. While this bill is not in line with New Action policies it gained a majority vote in favour of its introduction to the Senate within New Action. Anyone can still join the armed forces it just that with a separation of those who stand to distract each other the Glamorgan Act hopes to bring a more efficient and morally upright Armed Force. |
Date | 17:48:40, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Cildanian Freedom Union | To | Debating the Glamorgan Act |
Message | We object in the strongest possible terms...36 of them. |
Date | 19:43:46, January 13, 2008 CET | From | Cildanian Workers Coalition | To | Debating the Glamorgan Act |
Message | Well thankfully that nasty piece of legislation has been defeated |
Date | 23:17:37, January 13, 2008 CET | From | Cildanian Imperial Party | To | Debating the Glamorgan Act |
Message | I do support this bill! |
Date | 20:18:25, January 14, 2008 CET | From | Christian Action | To | Debating the Glamorgan Act |
Message | And the horse leaped the bar but the judge had already gone to bed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 26 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 196 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 103 |
Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
Random quote: "[The Constitution preserves] the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...[where] the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." - James Madison |