We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: PSFVP Pollution Standards Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2512
Description[?]:
| When so many of Sekowo's citizens are poor, why are we allowing such restrictive pollution controls on things like factorys, which can provide vital employment for our citizens. Another case of foolishly puting the environment ahead of the people! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:22:26, January 06, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the PSFVP Pollution Standards Bill |
| Message | The environment is more important than the people, since the people are wholly dependant on the environment. |
| Date | 06:01:19, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Communist Party of Sekowo | To | Debating the PSFVP Pollution Standards Bill |
| Message | What specific changes are asked for by the Family Value's Party. This perposal is vague and we can't support it. |
| Date | 14:36:39, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the PSFVP Pollution Standards Bill |
| Message | Yeah, could you provide some specific things that will change. We are undediced at the moment. |
| Date | 16:33:59, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the PSFVP Pollution Standards Bill |
| Message | We support responsible capitalism. |
| Date | 23:32:20, January 06, 2008 CET | From | Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the PSFVP Pollution Standards Bill |
| Message | Companie's will still be responsible. The social incentive, as well as the good buisness incentive, will meaan that no buisness will want to be seen as a heavy polluter, since it will be bad for buisness. In general, all this bill does is make things less restrictive. The wording of the current law says "highly restrictive". We do not think that buisness' that are already likely not to pollute should have their buisness damaged by highly restrictive regulations. |
| Date | 00:00:44, January 07, 2008 CET | From | Communist Party of Sekowo | To | Debating the PSFVP Pollution Standards Bill |
| Message | I can't agree this is too vague. |
| Date | 00:01:29, January 07, 2008 CET | From | Communist Party of Sekowo | To | Debating the PSFVP Pollution Standards Bill |
| Message | With standards would be changed and which would be the same? |
| Date | 04:05:40, January 07, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the PSFVP Pollution Standards Bill |
| Message | You are still being vauge, if it changes nothing, why do anythng about it. |
| Date | 16:34:19, January 07, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the PSFVP Pollution Standards Bill |
| Message | If this were made much more specific, we might consider voting for it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 225 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 423 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 102 |
| Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "I think it's about time we voted for senators with breasts. After all, we've been voting for boobs long enough." - Clarie Sargent |