Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 00:51:48
Server time: 15:08:11, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): AethanKal | ImperialLodamun | itsjustgav | johndoe1322 | JWDL | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Right to Arms Act of 2512

Details

Submitted by[?]: Démocrates de la Gauche

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2513

Description[?]:

Article 1
Click here to remove this proposal.

Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.

Old value:: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.

Current: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.

Proposed: Adult individuals may own guns under strict license conditions.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:50:06, January 07, 2008 CET
FromCommunist Party of Sekowo
ToDebating the The Right to Arms Act of 2512
MessageWould you like to buy guns from Sekowo?

Date10:47:56, January 07, 2008 CET
From Socialist Jelbanian Party-D.L.J.-D.L.F
ToDebating the The Right to Arms Act of 2512
MessageWe are surprised by the recent proposals of DG, we surely can't support this

Date14:59:41, January 07, 2008 CET
From Démocrates de la Gauche
ToDebating the The Right to Arms Act of 2512
MessageSuprised? How is this suprising? It's not like I am saying there is no restrictions on guns. I believe that under very strict guidelines someone should be allowed to purchase firearms.

Date18:32:39, January 07, 2008 CET
From Socialist Jelbanian Party-D.L.J.-D.L.F
ToDebating the The Right to Arms Act of 2512
MessageWhy? For proud? We have the police, and sports with weapons are already permitted by our laws...we see no reason for this proposal

Date01:59:06, January 08, 2008 CET
From Démocrates de la Gauche
ToDebating the The Right to Arms Act of 2512
MessageFor a person's own complete sense of security. For a person has the right.

Date12:02:05, January 08, 2008 CET
From Socialist Jelbanian Party-D.L.J.-D.L.F
ToDebating the The Right to Arms Act of 2512
MessageIf we don't trust in the state and in the police, a weapon is not the better solution in our opinion.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 309

no
    

Total Seats: 192

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Google Translate can help you with those language translations: https://translate.google.com/

    Random quote: "If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin." - Charles Darwin

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 57