We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: LP reform act 1.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2513
Description[?]:
Agriculture reform |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government agricultural and farming subsidies policy.
Old value:: Agricultural crops which are considered beneficial to the enviroment or to the continued ecological safety of the state are subsidized.
Current: The government allows local governments to craft agricultural subsidy policy.
Proposed: The government denies subsidy assistance to farmers.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning genetically modified (GM) crops.
Old value:: Production and selling of GM crops is banned. Research is allowed.
Current: All activities related to production, selling or researching of GM crops are allowed.
Proposed: There is no policy concerning GM crops.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning the use of pesticides.
Old value:: The government approves and regulates agricultural chemical use.
Current: The government approves and regulates agricultural chemical use.
Proposed: There is no government oversight or regulation of pesticides.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:27:03, January 07, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary Socialist Party | To | Debating the LP reform act 1. |
Message | Why ? What good will this do ? |
Date | 22:40:03, January 07, 2008 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the LP reform act 1. |
Message | Article 1 frees up the market for farmers to do what they know best. Article 2 LP sees no reason to ban GM as long as GM products are properly labeled. Article 3 Farmers are just as any other sector employees/employers. LP is against special privileges |
Date | 22:48:19, January 07, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary Socialist Party | To | Debating the LP reform act 1. |
Message | Article 1 may poison our food Article 2 I see no major problem with but will have to look into it more before i vote either way Article 3 ehh we need them crops to live ... if their not subsidized then the farmer will have to raise prices considerably |
Date | 22:54:31, January 07, 2008 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the LP reform act 1. |
Message | Article 1 they do not benefit from poisoning your food. It would be horribly bad for them. 2. People should be free to use GM products if they choose to do so. 3. We don't need other sector workers? Lets say all the IT guys stopped working or all the power plant workers? Can you see the result of that? Our modern industrial society needs all of our different industry workers :) |
Date | 23:56:11, January 07, 2008 CET | From | Pantheism Capitalistic Party UCF | To | Debating the LP reform act 1. |
Message | We support one and two but not three. The government must protect people from externalities even if a free market exists. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 459 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 291 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: To see what other nations are up to and to actively involve yourself in international activities: check the Roleplaying section on the forum! Don't be shy to make a news post about your party's recent achievements. |
Random quote: "Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon so long as there is no answer to it gives claws to the weak." - George Orwell |