We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Volunteers for the Army
Details
Submitted by[?]: Bloc Militaire pour Restauration
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2516
Description[?]:
| Considering the fact that many volunteers want to join the army to defend Jelbania, the Assemblee Nationale decides that they are allowed join the army and are allowed to posses weapons for the time being until the end of the state of emergency. The army will decide which volunteers will join the army. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:49:52, January 13, 2008 CET | From |  Revolutionary Constit'nal United Front | To | Debating the Volunteers for the Army |
| Message | Strongly support. Let our partisan blessed warriors wield the weapons that spell the doom of all godless heathen terrorists. |
| Date | 00:48:45, January 14, 2008 CET | From | Anarchistes pour une Société Libre | To | Debating the Volunteers for the Army |
| Message | You forget that the working class supports our Party and our policies, for it is in their best interest to do so. We wish to hand them the country on a platter, you wish to keep them enslaved. The good-ol'-boys support us, not you. |
| Date | 01:46:09, January 14, 2008 CET | From | Centre Démocratique | To | Debating the Volunteers for the Army |
| Message | PLMO, less than 10% of the nation voted for your party (and less than 8% voted for your party in Perimor), so please refrain from claiming you speak for entire class or group of people. You are violent ideologues and you will be brought down by the freedom and peace-loving people of Jelbania. |
| Date | 02:59:57, January 14, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary Constit'nal United Front | To | Debating the Volunteers for the Army |
| Message | OOC: PLMO, you're a moderate unitarist and generally support big government. No libertarian, state-rightist "good old boy" would ever support your party. |
| Date | 03:38:10, January 14, 2008 CET | From | Anarchistes pour une Société Libre | To | Debating the Volunteers for the Army |
| Message | Both IC & OOC: The Separatists are not the same thing as the CDF or the PLMO. The Separatist movement is a group of people who fight against the federal government for various reasons. The PLMO and CDF is Separatist because the Federal government is dominated by fascists. Others support Separatism because they are for little or no federal intervention in local matters. The working class in general supports Separatism, because the vanguard of the movement is the PLMO, which is a Party purely for the dictatorship of the working class. Also, all election results are either unreliable or fraudulent, because the ruling parties have fixed the voting machines, and you cannot expect people to go vote when they are in the middle of a warzone, or are fighting Federal forces. |
| Date | 03:53:36, January 14, 2008 CET | From | Centre Démocratique | To | Debating the Volunteers for the Army |
| Message | What has the federal government done that can be considered fascist? That is a false accusation designed to be an excuse for your violent, murderous uprising. |
| Date | 03:55:23, January 14, 2008 CET | From | Centre Démocratique | To | Debating the Volunteers for the Army |
| Message | What is really strange is you describe the federal government as fascist, but you say your party wishes to create a "dictatorship of the working class." UCC does not support a dictatorship of any kind, though it is quite clear PLMO does. |
| Date | 07:07:39, January 14, 2008 CET | From | Démocrates de la Gauche | To | Debating the Volunteers for the Army |
| Message | The Working Class is a group of people. You could also say in a way we are a "dictatorship of the assembly". Or "dictatorship of the voters". That is what that mean instead of with working citizens. Not to deem it as facist but. Isn't it odd at the ways the CUF is deeming the actions of the PBN? I mean butchering? Murderous Rampages? I believe most of them are false and simply made-up. I mean there is no evidence. Call me a radical if you want but where is the evidence? |
| Date | 13:54:31, January 14, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary Constit'nal United Front | To | Debating the Volunteers for the Army |
| Message | OOC: Okay now you're doing a lot of assuming about the separatists. If you want to ignore the actual statistics of the game, then what's stopping us from assuming some rogue anti-communist (who is not at all affiliated with the CUF!) hijacking biological weapons and gassing the entire state of Perimor & Turadrad? Your rebellion and your separatists only represent your 9% constituency. If perhaps some other party supported the rebellion, the rebellion would include that constituency. As of now, only supporters of a unitarist, big government communist state are participating in the revolt. Don't assume otherwise. The CUF for instance have often been for extreme small government--where there is little to no federal intervention. We are the second largest party, so it's safe to assume that constituents for small, local government are not supporting your side in the rebellion. |
| Date | 20:57:10, January 14, 2008 CET | From | Centre Démocratique | To | Debating the Volunteers for the Army |
| Message | The reference to butchering our people is quite accurate. Please see the reference from PLMOTV which stated the following: "All Federal forces have either been killed and run out of the city." These are men and women (who out of national pride volunteered to join our military) who would be alive today if CDF/PLMO did not resort to violence to achieve their political goals. That is butchering. That is bloodshed. And it was completely uneccessary. I do not understand why Démocrates de la Gauche continue to support and defend the murderous and undemocratic actions of PLMO. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 401 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 100 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
| Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician |