We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Education (Private School Regulation) Amendment Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2519
Description[?]:
| An act to ensure private schools meet the standards required of educational establishments. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The education system.
Old value:: There is a free public education system alongside private schools.
Current: There is a free public education system alongside private schools.
Proposed: There is a free public education system and a small number of private schools, which are heavily regulated to ensure they teach adequate skills and information.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:55:38, January 17, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Education (Private School Regulation) Amendment Act |
| Message | Should we be letting private schools teach whatever they want? Of course not. We must ensure that all students get sufficient education, and while we can directly enforce that in state run schools, we current cannot in private schools. This must change. |
| Date | 14:25:42, January 17, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Education (Private School Regulation) Amendment Act |
| Message | So much for wanting to deregulate private schools. Opposed. |
| Date | 18:29:36, January 17, 2008 CET | From | Tukarali Graenix Party | To | Debating the Education (Private School Regulation) Amendment Act |
| Message | I oppose |
| Date | 21:41:43, January 17, 2008 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Education (Private School Regulation) Amendment Act |
| Message | We happen to like the current system and don't see any immediat need of chance, though we might consider |
| Date | 21:52:09, January 17, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Education (Private School Regulation) Amendment Act |
| Message | This is simple a matter of ensuring private schools provide a good service. If we make children go to school, we should make sure they go to a school that actually teaches them. |
| Date | 00:25:43, January 18, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Education (Private School Regulation) Amendment Act |
| Message | I take it someone has never been to private school. |
| Date | 15:26:00, January 18, 2008 CET | From | National Labour Party | To | Debating the Education (Private School Regulation) Amendment Act |
| Message | Supported. |
| Date | 15:26:36, January 18, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Education (Private School Regulation) Amendment Act |
| Message | Th NLP speaks. |
| Date | 01:23:32, January 19, 2008 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the Education (Private School Regulation) Amendment Act |
| Message | oppose why should we limit the number of private schools to small when parents who send their children there still are part of the tax base supporting public schools??????? |
| Date | 01:23:51, January 19, 2008 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the Education (Private School Regulation) Amendment Act |
| Message | JUP - why this rush of bills without debate? |
| Date | 03:38:09, January 19, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Education (Private School Regulation) Amendment Act |
| Message | They were left for debate for 9 months - 1.5 RL days. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 180 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 213 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 81 |
| Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset. |
| Random quote: "Someone who wields power in name only can never compete with those who wield it through action." - Franz Reichert, former Luthorian politician |