We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: DSP.054.2518
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2519
Description[?]:
We believe the current system of double monopolies, in which only private companies run regional lines and only the government runs national, is unethical and bad for the economy. We believe a system in which a public train system exists alongside private ones is the best solution. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Train Operating Companies (TOC).
Old value:: Private companies operate regional TOC's. The national service is provided by a publicly owned, national TOC.
Current: The State owns and operates a national TOC, alongside private TOCs.
Proposed: The State owns and operates a national TOC, alongside private TOCs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:19:36, January 18, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the DSP.054.2518 |
Message | We don't particularly like either of these options. |
Date | 21:00:49, January 18, 2008 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the DSP.054.2518 |
Message | We believe in privatising everything and letting private companies slog it out. |
Date | 00:52:39, January 19, 2008 CET | From | Sekowan Communist Party | To | Debating the DSP.054.2518 |
Message | The Free Democratic Party seems only to want a tyranny of the corporation over the individual. |
Date | 04:01:52, January 19, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the DSP.054.2518 |
Message | FDP: How would you vote on this one? |
Date | 12:47:42, January 19, 2008 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the DSP.054.2518 |
Message | SCP, under a FDP state, corporations would not have limited liability (look it up, you probably don't know what it means) and therefore there can be no tyranny of the corporation as companies would not be separate legal entities, and merely a collection of individuals who own the "company". Furthermore, if the initiation of force is banned, there can be no tyranny as everything is done by voluntary exchange and mutual consent |
Date | 16:47:40, January 19, 2008 CET | From | Peasant Party Of Sekowo | To | Debating the DSP.054.2518 |
Message | This seems like privatization to me. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 700 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 50 |
Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called 'the People's Stick.'" - Mikhail Bakunin |