We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: the right to choose
Details
Submitted by[?]: Seosavists Republican party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2107
Description[?]:
| Women have the right to choose if they want an abortion or not they should not be forced to have their lives ruined. Especialy as the current legislation stops abortion in case of rape. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the first trimester.
Proposed: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:39:14, September 05, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the the right to choose |
| Message | This is what we always supported. |
| Date | 23:05:45, September 05, 2005 CET | From | National Forwardist Party | To | Debating the the right to choose |
| Message | as do we. |
| Date | 01:44:14, September 06, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the the right to choose |
| Message | We've only just banned this and everyone has the same number of seats. What makes you think anyone will vote differently? No-one has the right to murder innocent children. This is an outrage! |
| Date | 07:26:37, September 06, 2005 CET | From | National Forwardist Party | To | Debating the the right to choose |
| Message | you mean like with nukes? |
| Date | 18:58:25, September 06, 2005 CET | From | Seosavists Republican party | To | Debating the the right to choose |
| Message | HA HA! :D |
| Date | 23:10:51, September 06, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the the right to choose |
| Message | I don't think the electorate will like the LLP's lack of coherency on this subject. |
| Date | 09:00:49, September 07, 2005 CET | From | National Forwardist Party | To | Debating the the right to choose |
| Message | I think the lack of coherency from the LLP is the least of what the electorate is going to dislike this coming election. they have much greater problems with what's being vomited up at your end of the room and being voted on. |
| Date | 21:02:51, September 07, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the the right to choose |
| Message | Really? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 311 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 287 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 2 |
| Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands?" - Ernest Gaines |