Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5477
Next month in: 00:31:32
Server time: 15:28:27, April 30, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): GDAC37 | LC73DunMHP | lulus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Biological & Chemical Weaponry Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Gluaiseacht Shaoráil DhaonlathachIt

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2522

Description[?]:

To be prepared.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:23:18, January 22, 2008 CET
FromConservative and Environmentalist Party
ToDebating the Biological & Chemical Weaponry Act
Messageoppose

Date02:18:26, January 23, 2008 CET
FromAnti Egalitarian Alliance
ToDebating the Biological & Chemical Weaponry Act
MessageAgreed.

Date20:45:38, January 23, 2008 CET
FromKirlawan Popular Front
ToDebating the Biological & Chemical Weaponry Act
MessageWe oppose this move. We are committed to continued research in the technologies in order to help us to protect ourselves should another nation use such weapons against us. But it is beyond our understanding why we would ever use such weapons, and as such there is no reason to own them.

Date19:31:15, January 24, 2008 CET
FromGluaiseacht Shaoráil DhaonlathachIt
ToDebating the Biological & Chemical Weaponry Act
MessageIt would be in line with our nuclear policy. One never knows...

Date19:57:37, January 24, 2008 CET
FromKirlawan Popular Front
ToDebating the Biological & Chemical Weaponry Act
MessageWe don't see the two as being equitable. Nuclear deterrence has a specific value, but biological and chemical warfare are far more uncertain.

Date06:56:29, January 25, 2008 CET
FromGluaiseacht Shaoráil DhaonlathachIt
ToDebating the Biological & Chemical Weaponry Act
MessageNBC weapons can be used in a tactical and strategic sense. To us there is no difference.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 180

no
 

Total Seats: 76

abstain
      

Total Seats: 461


Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62