We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Family Values Act 2520
Details
Submitted by[?]: Fatherland Salvation Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2521
Description[?]:
- |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning who can proceed with adoption; in case adoption is legal.
Old value:: Everyone may adopt children.
Current: Only couples may adopt children.
Proposed: Only heterosexual couples may adopt children.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The legality of divorces (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Current: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Proposed: Only divorces that comply with religious doctrine are legal.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on population control.
Old value:: The government does not engage in population control.
Current: The government does not engage in population control.
Proposed: The government actively promotes population growth.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on sexual relations.
Old value:: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Current: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Proposed: Sexual relations are only legal for procreation.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women serve alongside men.
Current: Women serve alongside men.
Proposed: Women can only serve in non-battle positions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:23:07, January 22, 2008 CET | From | Libertarian Socialists of Endralon | To | Debating the Family Values Act 2520 |
Message | We have no words strong enough to describe the insanity involved in this bill. How the hell does the CPU propose that the state find out whether or not people are having sex for the purposes of 'procreation' alone? Do they intend to install CCTV cameras in all our bedrooms? As for banning divorce do they have no idea about what sort of problems that will result in and have they lost all understanding of the concept of individual liberties? |
Date | 19:06:03, January 22, 2008 CET | From | National Defender Party | To | Debating the Family Values Act 2520 |
Message | We agree with articles 3 and 4.. But we are sorry, we have to disagree.. |
Date | 19:06:51, January 22, 2008 CET | From | National Defender Party | To | Debating the Family Values Act 2520 |
Message | But we are two government parties, so NDP will abstain. |
Date | 19:12:07, January 22, 2008 CET | From | National Defender Party | To | Debating the Family Values Act 2520 |
Message | NDP does not ever disagree with government partner. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 65 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 224 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 210 |
Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
Random quote: "I like to pay taxes. With them I buy civilization." - Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. |