Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 01:55:58
Server time: 06:04:01, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Normand Federalization Bill (2520)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Normand Pluralist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2522

Description[?]:

The diversity found in Sekowo and its native beliefs and customs appear to be crumbling before unnecessary centralization. We propose that traditional cutlures and governments in Sekowo be respected and encouraged.

This bill would also provide for the establishment of a small committee to oversee local regulation; local governments who abuse the privelege of local governance of these issues shall find this privelege revoked.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:07:40, January 23, 2008 CET
FromSekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the Normand Federalization Bill (2520)
MessageNo.

Date07:39:16, January 23, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Normand Federalization Bill (2520)
MessageAs usual, we agree with SCP, we do not support any of these.

Date20:08:11, January 23, 2008 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Normand Federalization Bill (2520)
MessageWe fully support this bill.

Date23:12:53, January 23, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Normand Federalization Bill (2520)
MessageNo as usual.

Date07:43:13, January 24, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Normand Federalization Bill (2520)
MessageUSMC, is that no to all, or would there be any provisions you would support alone?

Date17:03:57, January 24, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Normand Federalization Bill (2520)
MessageArticle 1: We like the current one at this time.

Article 2: We like the current one at this time. We feel a danger to the fauna and flora of Sekowo.

Article 3: We like the current one at this time. We feel an abuse of waste would happen and cause danger to the environment.

Article 4: We like the current one at this time. Otherwise, it might bring down the education system.

At this time, we will oppose this bill.

Date21:05:32, January 26, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Normand Federalization Bill (2520)
MessageWe may support the hunting and fishing.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 256

no
     

Total Seats: 478

abstain
 

Total Seats: 16


Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German").

Random quote: "Democracy is in peril." - Ralph Nader (referring to turnout in the 1996 US presidential election)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 88