We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Luxary Availability Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rightist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2524
Description[?]:
| TBD |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Sales tax on luxury goods.
Old value:: 19
Current: 27
Proposed: 15
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:04:23, January 24, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | We do support any decrease in taxes, however, the current budget cannot support such a decrease. |
| Date | 21:37:52, January 24, 2008 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | oppose until this nation musters the discipline to cut the budget, this bill cannot be passed |
| Date | 21:44:26, January 24, 2008 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | We'll oppose. |
| Date | 21:47:02, January 24, 2008 CET | From | Tukarali Graenix Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | 'Luxury' is misspelled. I'm not a nitpicker, it's just because it's in the title |
| Date | 06:03:45, January 26, 2008 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | the spelling is incorrect in this bill |
| Date | 17:42:57, January 26, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | Ya know? I busted on JUP for correcting your spelling JDW. |
| Date | 23:43:17, January 26, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | And you shouldn't have. In Acts of the Council, it is of utmost important that they are phrased correctly, and with correct spelling. This makes it easier for the Judiciary and Executive to implement and enforce, and makes it easier to search for bills in the future. |
| Date | 05:24:55, January 27, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | Oh shut up JUP! This isn't real life. Ill spel thngs teh way I wnt 2 spl them! |
| Date | 12:59:09, January 27, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | That's disgusting, and an affront to every person who's ever learnt English. Txt spelling is something that should be targeted and destroyed by all right-minded English speakers. |
| Date | 14:18:58, January 27, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | O brther. How g8 it is to c the JUP getting riled up. |
| Date | 02:13:09, January 29, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | This will put us into a large deficit. We cannot allow this currently. |
| Date | 09:57:06, January 29, 2008 CET | From | JDW Tukarali Greens Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | RP - I do not remember the incident, but this is not biggie just go to the bottom of the bill page and fix the spelling and hit save |
| Date | 13:53:14, January 29, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | JUP! THE BUDGET IS NOT EVEN WORKING!!!!! |
| Date | 19:35:06, January 29, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | What do you mean, the budget isn't working? We get tax. We spend it on ministries. It is as working as it's going to get. |
| Date | 22:38:37, January 29, 2008 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | GAH!!!! You are so ignorant it is not funny. When you click on the budget what is written in red? "This is a feature under development, do not consider it working yet!" Thank you for playing. |
| Date | 22:47:59, January 29, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Luxary Availability Act |
| Message | Yes, but it's not actually under development, so it is as working as it ever will be. The fact that it is not perfect is no reason not to use it as is. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 119 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 381 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated. |
| Random quote: "Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands?" - Ernest Gaines |