We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Sex-Ed Act of 2522
Details
Submitted by[?]: Parti Socialiste
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2522
Description[?]:
| ... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Sexual education in schools.
Old value:: This decision is up to the schools themselves without government regulation.
Current: Schools have an obligation to give sexual education at some point in puberty.
Proposed: Schools have an obligation to give sexual education at some point in puberty, but individual students have an opt-out option.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:56:24, January 26, 2008 CET | From | Parti Libertaire | To | Debating the The Sex-Ed Act of 2522 |
| Message | No. |
| Date | 02:24:26, January 26, 2008 CET | From | Parti Socialiste | To | Debating the The Sex-Ed Act of 2522 |
| Message | Of course no reason except no. |
| Date | 04:00:40, January 26, 2008 CET | From | Union Pour Un Movement Populaire | To | Debating the The Sex-Ed Act of 2522 |
| Message | They don't need to give you a reason. But we would prefer if no one could opt out. |
| Date | 04:08:10, January 26, 2008 CET | From | Parti Socialiste | To | Debating the The Sex-Ed Act of 2522 |
| Message | Why shan't they give me a reason? They sure don't like the bill. If they are going to say anything at all they should at least explain why not if they go forward and step out to say no in the first place. |
| Date | 04:08:11, January 26, 2008 CET | From | Parti Socialiste | To | Debating the The Sex-Ed Act of 2522 |
| Message | Why shan't they give me a reason? They sure don't like the bill. If they are going to say anything at all they should at least explain why not if they go forward and step out to say no in the first place. |
| Date | 04:36:55, January 26, 2008 CET | From | Union Pour Un Movement Populaire | To | Debating the The Sex-Ed Act of 2522 |
| Message | Well yeah, but there are idiots in congress who don't have to give reasons.... |
| Date | 04:59:34, January 26, 2008 CET | From | Parti Socialiste | To | Debating the The Sex-Ed Act of 2522 |
| Message | Oh ok I thought you meant that it was self explanitory or something. |
| Date | 17:36:18, January 26, 2008 CET | From | Union Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD) | To | Debating the The Sex-Ed Act of 2522 |
| Message | We would assume that school boards, who are elected by their communities can make the call regarding this specific topic. If voters truly wanted their children to learn this, they should vote it in at a local level. There seems to be no real reason that this should be imposed from on high. If local schools do not adequately teach this subject, parents can surely explain it to their own children. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 274 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 226 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players should not role-play characters without the consent of the owner, and if they find they have role-played the character beyond what the owner intended, they should withdraw or amend the role-play appropriately. |
| Random quote: "When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called 'the People's Stick.'" - Mikhail Bakunin |