We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Fairness in malpractise suits
Details
Submitted by[?]: Socialist Liberal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2108
Description[?]:
| I think it is important that we don't put postgraduates off from becoming doctors with many malpractise suits. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Malpractice suits.
Old value:: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Current: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Proposed: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors only if death occurs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:15:54, September 07, 2005 CET | From | Republic of Aloria Party | To | Debating the Fairness in malpractise suits |
| Message | what if you were to get a nose job and they messed it up and you started to bleed throught your nose everytime you sneezed? what then you arent dead so you cant do anything? thats messed up. |
| Date | 12:03:55, September 07, 2005 CET | From | Alorian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Fairness in malpractise suits |
| Message | I must agree with this, there are many nasty accidents that deserve compensation that could not be compensated for if this passes, eg. paralysis due to malpractice. We support the current format and in our previous billing we capped the compensation so it wouldnt be so much of a problem. |
| Date | 18:41:23, September 07, 2005 CET | From | Socialist Liberal Party | To | Debating the Fairness in malpractise suits |
| Message | Noone is forcing you to go through with the operation. You may get paralysed in the operation, but at least you didn't die of whatever you were being operated for. |
| Date | 12:19:12, September 08, 2005 CET | From | Alorian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Fairness in malpractise suits |
| Message | You go into an operation on the good faith that the doctor will not be negligent, if a complication arrises then so be it, but if a worker suffers through negligence and then cannot work does he not have the right to claim medical expenses and the compensation for not being able to work again? |
| Date | 16:40:28, September 08, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Liberal Party | To | Debating the Fairness in malpractise suits |
| Message | I am afraid I too am opposed to this bill. It is dangerous and could result in helpless patients who have nowhere to turn. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 146 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 151 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 103 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "You will win, but you will not convince. You will win, because you possess more than enough brute force, but you will not convince, because to convince means to persuade. And in order to persuade you would need what you lack, reason and right in the struggle." - Miguel de Unamuno |