We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: United Countries Alliance
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hutori Hopeace Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2525
Description[?]:
| This bill is aimed at forging the Most Serene Republic of Hutori with the United Countries. From this we would gain plenty of comrades in arms, trade, etc. It is a union of good nations with good people, and since such is so for this country, the match is simple. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:58:58, January 29, 2008 CET | From | Skull & Bones Party | To | Debating the United Countries Alliance |
| Message | We would not support this in it's present form. Much too vague. Guarantees of national sovereignty would have to be assured before we ever consider supporting. |
| Date | 01:09:48, January 30, 2008 CET | From | Hutori Hopeace Party | To | Debating the United Countries Alliance |
| Message | http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/United_Countries |
| Date | 01:55:49, January 30, 2008 CET | From | National Royalist Party | To | Debating the United Countries Alliance |
| Message | Foreigners can go to hell. |
| Date | 05:15:43, January 30, 2008 CET | From | Skull & Bones Party | To | Debating the United Countries Alliance |
| Message | We concur with the NRP. The united country treaty is just an attempt at drawing member nations into a communist super state. We will vote no on this measure. |
| Date | 05:57:59, January 30, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Union | To | Debating the United Countries Alliance |
| Message | We would support it. |
| Date | 14:28:10, January 30, 2008 CET | From | National Royalist Party | To | Debating the United Countries Alliance |
| Message | What do we need them for? Surely while they are busy "co-operationg" we can be focusing on better things for our nation? I also note that the organisation has little international support, therefore the benefits to our people are too small to consider this a good idea. |
| Date | 16:56:36, January 31, 2008 CET | From | Groene ArbeidersPartij | To | Debating the United Countries Alliance |
| Message | And if everyone would think that it is still too small, it 'd never get bigger now would it? We agree. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 64 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 206 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people and neither do we." - George W. Bush |