We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 2106
Details
Submitted by[?]: People's Front of Kalistan
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2107
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Neo-Libertarian Party of Kalistan
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Proletarian Socialist Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Neo-Libertarian Party of Kalistan
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Proletarian Socialist Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the People's Front of Kalistan
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Proletarian Socialist Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Neo-Libertarian Party of Kalistan
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Proletarian Socialist Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:37:08, September 07, 2005 CET | From | Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2106 |
| Message | I am glad thet you have confidence in us. Your trust will not be misplaced. |
| Date | 04:37:46, September 07, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Libertarian Party of Kalistan | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2106 |
| Message | We've held the Foreign Affairs office for the last 5 terms, and we believe we've done well. We can't accept this unless we are given that office. We're willing to give up Internal Affairs for it. |
| Date | 06:00:37, September 07, 2005 CET | From | Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2106 |
| Message | You have health and Human Services as well. Elections will be held in little more than a year. Let us agree to the cabinet for now, and your grevences can be considered next term. Besides, mabye its time to let someone else have a turn at FA ; ). |
| Date | 07:15:04, September 07, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Libertarian Party of Kalistan | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2106 |
| Message | This is a bad cabinet we shouldn't vote for. However, we are. |
| Date | 16:33:40, September 07, 2005 CET | From | Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2106 |
| Message | Bad Cabinet?! To our knowlege, none of the apointed officials in this cabinet have demonstrated any degree of incompetency. Just because you didn't get the Foreign Affairs position does not make this a bad cabinet. |
| Date | 18:16:51, September 07, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Libertarian Party of Kalistan | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2106 |
| Message | Actually, it has more parties then it requires to make 50%, which makes it a bad cabinet. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 110 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 60 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 43 |
| Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
| Random quote: "If you're not turned on to politics, politics will turn on you." - Ralph Nader |