We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear Profileration Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Freedom Party of Lourenne
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2530
Description[?]:
| Enough with the bombs! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Proposed: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:33:26, February 10, 2008 CET | From | Federal Peace Movement | To | Debating the Nuclear Profileration Act |
| Message | Yes for peace. |
| Date | 08:58:45, February 10, 2008 CET | From | People's Anarchist Union | To | Debating the Nuclear Profileration Act |
| Message | We support peace, which is why we support Lourenne's right to nuclear weapons. With a nuclear deterrant, Lourenne is much less likely to be attacked. |
| Date | 15:11:24, February 10, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party of Lourenne | To | Debating the Nuclear Profileration Act |
| Message | I agree with the CPP |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 133 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 170 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "Socialists like to tout their confiscation and redistribution schemes as noble and caring, but we should ask if theft is ever noble or caring." - Robert Hawes |