We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Police Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2530
Description[?]:
| With the police now properly armed, there is no need for military support in emergencys, as the Police are now strong enough to support themselves. This allows the military to focus on defending the nation, while civil matters are left up to the police. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:46:31, February 10, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Military Police Act |
| Message | We have no police forces. This is unacceptable. As this already qualifies as a "serious emergency", we see no reason to change the law. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 104 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 646 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "Everything that is really great and inspiring is created by the individual who can labor in freedom." - Albert Einstein |