We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: CP.0034.2531 Reverse DSP Environmental Bill of 2463
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2532
Description[?]:
| Lourenne has been given enough of our money. 7 Billion SEK a year? No. This has to stop. Striking down this old bill will be a good first step in reducing Sekowo's governmental waste from the previous socialist governments. Endangered species are already protected by current Sekowan AND Lourenne laws. Thus the reason of the original bill is not longer valid. This bill is not contesting what the situation was at that time in 2463 but this law's expiry date is long overdue. The effects of this bill will be included in the next budget of the Minister of Finance. See original bill: "Environmental Protection of the Sekowo/Lourenne Area Act of 2463" Submitted by: Democratic Socialists Party (DSP) http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=143821 |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 06:27:57, February 14, 2008 CET | From | Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the CP.0034.2531 Reverse DSP Environmental Bill of 2463 |
| Message | We support strongly, there has to be a cheaper way to fufil our obligations |
| Date | 06:35:58, February 14, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the CP.0034.2531 Reverse DSP Environmental Bill of 2463 |
| Message | If 7 billion SEK to Lourenne is for environment only ... I wonder how much more we are giving them. |
| Date | 06:39:37, February 14, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the CP.0034.2531 Reverse DSP Environmental Bill of 2463 |
| Message | That is the only money we give to Lourenne, period. We did give them a one time economic boost package decades ago, but that was only for one time. While we do not oppose lowering this, we do oppose all out stopping it. We believe that we should still be providing one to three billion to keep joint environmental protection programs funded. OOC: Technically, the time period this was passed, their was a Libertarian government in charge, not a Socialist one. |
| Date | 06:58:36, February 14, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the CP.0034.2531 Reverse DSP Environmental Bill of 2463 |
| Message | The CP recommends to the DSP to propose a new economic aid package for Lourenne with specific goals and expiration time that would be reviewed by the Minister of Foreign Affairs and then put to a vote. OOC: Typical socialist. If it's not the capitalists' fault, it's the libertarians'. =D Only joking. A bit. =D |
| Date | 00:34:05, February 15, 2008 CET | From | Peasant Party Of Sekowo | To | Debating the CP.0034.2531 Reverse DSP Environmental Bill of 2463 |
| Message | I agree this is wasteful liberal corrupt spending. Our hard working families should not tolerate this. |
| Date | 00:35:08, February 15, 2008 CET | From | Peasant Party Of Sekowo | To | Debating the CP.0034.2531 Reverse DSP Environmental Bill of 2463 |
| Message | We would prefer whatever enviromental spending be focused on sustanibility of our resources and planet. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 614 | |||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 136 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account. |
| Random quote: "A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground." - H.L. Mencken |