Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5475
Next month in: 00:40:31
Server time: 03:19:28, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: CP.0040.2533 CP Requirements for Zardugal-Cobura War Support

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2535

Description[?]:

To support our military if we do enter in the Free Federation of Zardugal versus Republic of Cobura war.

This is a condition of CP's support for action as it will not support any motion that will send our men and women to fight without the complete and utter backing that they deserve.

Article 1 & 5: Bio Chem weaponry and warfare. We have to fight fire with fire, not wood. As the law states, they must strike first but we must be prepared. The CP has no wish to step away from this stance.

Article 2: POWs would be treated badly by Zardugal (according to their laws). We would be open to removal of this article if this allows the bill and resolution to pass.

[removed] Article 3: Torture only in emergencies. That can come up during wartime. [removed]

Article 4: The servicemen need the covert units to be able to assist whenever possible. The CP has no wish to step away from this stance.

Resolution 1:
-----------------
The CP is willing to allow Sekowo to fall into debt (as we have had such high surpluses for so many years that we can live off our savings) to fund our war effort.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:22:17, February 18, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the CP.0040.2533 CP Requirements for Zardugal-Cobura War Support
MessageApart from maybe PUA, I really doubt any other party would support this.

Date01:56:37, February 18, 2008 CET
FromPan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
ToDebating the CP.0040.2533 CP Requirements for Zardugal-Cobura War Support
MessageEven we don't like article 3....

Date02:19:01, February 18, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the CP.0040.2533 CP Requirements for Zardugal-Cobura War Support
MessageWe might actually support this, though it does not thrill us.

Date03:43:56, February 18, 2008 CET
FromPan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
ToDebating the CP.0040.2533 CP Requirements for Zardugal-Cobura War Support
MessageWere the article on Tourture to be dropped, we would support

Date06:19:03, February 18, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the CP.0040.2533 CP Requirements for Zardugal-Cobura War Support
MessagePUA's wish is granted.

Date07:22:48, February 18, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the CP.0040.2533 CP Requirements for Zardugal-Cobura War Support
MessageIf our wishes are not supported, we will vote against a combat role in this war. We are, however, not against a humanitarian role.

Date15:25:35, February 18, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the CP.0040.2533 CP Requirements for Zardugal-Cobura War Support
MessageWe arn't jumping for joy, but these are acceptable.

Date17:49:18, February 18, 2008 CET
FromPeasant Party Of Sekowo
ToDebating the CP.0040.2533 CP Requirements for Zardugal-Cobura War Support
MessageI fail to see how this would increase our battle readiness.

Date06:32:27, February 19, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the CP.0040.2533 CP Requirements for Zardugal-Cobura War Support
Message1) bio weaponry is just in case. The CP condones its usage but if certain nations (specifically Zardugal) uses them against us, we would need to strike back at least equally hard.

2) Certain nations (specifically Zardugal) would treat prisoners very harshly and unjustly, as stated by their laws. We should threaten the same although our laws treat prisoners so kindly, that there hardly would make much difference. This makes Sekowo seem like a tougher nation to deal with. Intimidation is good to have.

3) At the moment, our laws prevent any sort of covert operation. That legally eliminates one way that we can strike at certain nations (guess which). Sabotaging their military facilities such as anti-aircraft or naval yards will hinder their war effort.

Date14:26:32, February 19, 2008 CET
FromPeasant Party Of Sekowo
ToDebating the CP.0040.2533 CP Requirements for Zardugal-Cobura War Support
MessageArticle Three we can agree to the rest no.

Date04:04:41, February 20, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the CP.0040.2533 CP Requirements for Zardugal-Cobura War Support
MessageWe are curious why the PUA voted against.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 328

no
    

Total Seats: 422

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The forum contains a lot of useful information, it has updates to the game, role playing between nations, news and discussion. http://forum.particracy.net/

    Random quote: "The only thing that saves us from bureaucracy is its inefficiency." - Eugene McCarthy

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 92