Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 00:31:51
Server time: 11:28:08, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Reorganisation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Conservative Union

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2536

Description[?]:

An act to reorganise the military in order to ensure it's maximum effectiveness.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:25:01, February 19, 2008 CET
From One Nation Conservative Party
ToDebating the Military Reorganisation Act
MessageWe will support.

Date02:33:26, February 20, 2008 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Military Reorganisation Act
MessageWe'll vote yes, if you drop article 3.

Date07:19:31, February 20, 2008 CET
From Wessex High Imperial Party
ToDebating the Military Reorganisation Act
MessageWHIP will vote no on articles 1, 3 and 4. Women should protect and serve alongside men, and whether or not a person is homosexual or heterosexual is inconsequential on a battlefield. WHIP also believes in government ownership of defense industry.

We will support article 2 if posed under separate cover.

Date15:05:33, February 20, 2008 CET
From National Conservative Union
ToDebating the Military Reorganisation Act
MessageWhile we have often agreed to amend bills in order to ensure their passing we feel that the importance of these articles means that we must now take a stand. In order to ensure the people of Pontesia are fully aware of our party's position on these areas of vital concern to the military effectiveness of our nation we believe it is imperative that we do not buckle to pressure from other political party's on these matters.

The continued insistence of the WHIP that female soldiers serve openly and in the front lines goes against common worldwide policy. Female soldiers are just not equipped physically or mentally to cope with the demanding pressures of combat in the front lines. Our party wholly supports female participation in the military but the current policy places our military integrity and effectiveness at risk.

The National Conservative Union stands behind this bill, pass or fail, because we believe in supporting our principles. Pontesia must be properly protected and to do that our military must be able to operate at it's maximum effectiveness.

Date21:55:17, February 20, 2008 CET
From Christian Fascist Party
ToDebating the Military Reorganisation Act
MessageWe will support though we don't think article 3 goes far enough.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 112

no
   

Total Seats: 213

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Discuss flag designs at the Flag Designs thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37

    Random quote: "Capitalism is the only system that can make freedom, individuality, and the pursuit of values possible in practice." - Ayn Rand

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 81