We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public decency
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union of Progressive Ulama
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2109
Description[?]:
| It is not fitting for people to go about the country naked. In order to balance the need for community standards with civil liberties, this bill restricts nudity to designated nudist areas. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Current: Public nudity laws are left to local governments.
Proposed: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:00:16, September 10, 2005 CET | From |  Progressive Liberal Coalition | To | Debating the Public decency |
| Message | Well we were fine with the current law, but we're also fine with this, you have our support. |
| Date | 00:52:40, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Revolutionary Socialist Council | To | Debating the Public decency |
| Message | Whilst we are a fairly progressive party, we feel the idea of allowing citizens to walk around totally naked is taking things too far. |
| Date | 18:57:07, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Al'Badaran Bolshevik Movement (SC) | To | Debating the Public decency |
| Message | People have a right to be nude if they wish. Opposed. |
| Date | 20:09:21, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Union of Progressive Ulama | To | Debating the Public decency |
| Message | Of course people have a right to be nude. The question is, do they have the right to be nude everywhere, or do parents (for instance) have the right to protect their children from seeing other parading arounbd the streeets naked, thrusting their private parts into the faces of chidlren? Will no one think of ther children? ;) |
| Date | 04:35:53, September 12, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Liberal Coalition | To | Debating the Public decency |
| Message | Sorry again, I wasn't here for much of the weekend. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 67 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 83 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "A man who has no office to go to - I don't care who he is - is a trial of which you can have no conception." - George Bernard Shaw |