Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5477
Next month in: 01:15:37
Server time: 22:44:22, May 01, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): LC73DunMHP | PortCrab | Sam678 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religious Integration Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Kanjoran Imperial Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2109

Description[?]:

In our constant quest for morality, we must bring religion into our lives.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:01:18, September 10, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran People's Party
ToDebating the Religious Integration Act
MessageNo for all three items. We strongly support the separation of church and state within all levels of Kanjoran government so the first two are out. And this carries over to the education system. If one school feels it is Jesus is the lord and savior should Muslims and Jews have to pray the Glory Be or Hail Mary or have to listen to it every day from their teachers?

Date05:44:37, September 10, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran Imperial Party
ToDebating the Religious Integration Act
MessageREMEMBER, prayer does not have to be for anyone religion. Prayer can simply be a thankyou to a higher power or even to life itself. This proposal is more an exercise in thankfulness than in religion.

For the first two proposals, the local governments will have the ability to pay ministers who provide important community services and to appoint the least dangerous and most kind of religious leaders.

However, if the local governments feel as the KPP does, they can decline and not take any part in religion what-so-ever

Date12:47:53, September 10, 2005 CET
From Nationalist Freedom Party
ToDebating the Religious Integration Act
MessageNO for all three items.

As a catholic, I cannot vote for this. The state has no right to appoint Bishops, cardinals etc.

Date21:33:12, September 10, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran Imperial Party
ToDebating the Religious Integration Act
Messagewell, we guess we'll just have to pray that it will pass

Date21:48:59, September 10, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran People's Party
ToDebating the Religious Integration Act
MessageIf you'd like to bother your god with pointless begging, so be it.

Date10:56:12, September 11, 2005 CET
From Secular Humanist Party
ToDebating the Religious Integration Act
MessageNo to all three.
State laicity is a basic principle of freedom.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
   

Total Seats: 381

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453

Random quote: "Political correctness is just tyranny with manners." - Charlton Heston

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72