Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:16:18
Server time: 19:43:41, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Congressional Call for Community Communism, part 2

Details

Submitted by[?]: Iqembu Sokusebenzisana Yeningi

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2536

Description[?]:

We, the undersigned members of the Ikradonian National Congress, affirm the principles of community sovereignty in the pursuit of communism.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:53:50, February 21, 2008 CET
FromIqembu Sokusebenzisana Yeningi
ToDebating the Congressional Call for Community Communism, part 2
MessageProperty should not belong to the greedy, nor to the nation-state, but to the communities that are the heart and soul of Ikradon.

Date21:09:52, February 21, 2008 CET
FromBoston Tea Party
ToDebating the Congressional Call for Community Communism, part 2
MessageFull agreement on 2-4. We prefer #1 how it is but the proposed changes are at least acceptable.

Date22:00:40, February 21, 2008 CET
FromIqembu Sokusebenzisana Yeningi
ToDebating the Congressional Call for Community Communism, part 2
MessageProbably best to make banking an entirely separate bill in any case.

Date16:17:50, February 22, 2008 CET
FromYellow Party
ToDebating the Congressional Call for Community Communism, part 2
MessageWe cannot support any of these initiatives.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 216

no
   

Total Seats: 228

abstain
   

Total Seats: 155


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "The theory of Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: abolition of private property." - Karl Marx

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65