Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:00:56
Server time: 18:59:03, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Health 2537

Details

Submitted by[?]: Trabajo y Libertad

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2539

Description[?]:

Government duty to protect and preserve the population's health.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:17:44, February 26, 2008 CET
From Partido Santanderista
ToDebating the Health 2537
MessageArticles 1,2, 3, 5, 7 we support.

Article 4 - the current value we support, the better well off can afford to pay their own health service

Article 6 - same as above

Date23:10:05, February 26, 2008 CET
From Trabajo y Libertad
ToDebating the Health 2537
MessageThe reason to Article 4 is that allowing the rich to pay for their own health service means a two-tier health service will develop, with a high-quality service for the rich and an inferior public service for the poor as superior doctors will be "bought out" by the private services.

Date01:32:15, February 27, 2008 CET
From Partido Federalisto
ToDebating the Health 2537
MessageOpposed to all articles.

Date01:45:57, February 27, 2008 CET
From Partido Santanderista
ToDebating the Health 2537
MessageThe State should make sure that the free health system is not sub-par. It use this competition from the private sector to raise the bar instead of using it as an excuse to have no private sector at all.

Date10:19:45, February 27, 2008 CET
From Trabajo y Libertad
ToDebating the Health 2537
MessageThe problem is that certain people would use the private service as a matter of snobbery, allowing it to charge excessive fees that the impoverished couldn't afford. This would give it a greater source of funding allowing it to hire the best staff, while those left for the national health service are largely second-rate. Also, unregulated profit-driven healthcare providers will cut corners in order to cut costs, which will endanger their patients. Again the quest for profit will leave many in private healthcare accepting "commission" payments from pharmaceutical companies, etc. should they use a certain amount of their products, meaning private healthcare wil push certain treatments and medications when they are not needed. Finally, the fact the private system is profit-driven means it's customers are not being given a fair deal, private providers will be run by accountants not doctors.

Date10:41:32, February 29, 2008 CET
From Trabajo y Libertad
ToDebating the Health 2537
MessageWe've switched from proposing only public healthcare to including a small number of regulated private providers. This allows for competition between public and private providers while ensuring standards are met in all.

Date16:54:35, February 29, 2008 CET
From Partido Santanderista
ToDebating the Health 2537
MessageExcellent

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 42

no
    

Total Seats: 87

abstain
 

Total Seats: 8


Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election.

Random quote: "Men are so simple and so much inclined to obey immediate needs that a deceiver will never lack victims for his deceptions." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 88