Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 02:28:09
Server time: 13:31:50, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Opresion to Freedom Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: NWO Social Democratic Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2539

Description[?]:

Do not let the large corporations call the shots in government.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:13:20, February 27, 2008 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Opresion to Freedom Bill
Messagewe have a budget surplus why raise taxes?

Date16:55:19, February 27, 2008 CET
FromNWO Social Democratic Party
ToDebating the Opresion to Freedom Bill
MessageSurplus is good, bigger surplus is better. We must be prepared for unforcene desastors.

Date01:27:22, February 28, 2008 CET
FromZoroastrian People's Party
ToDebating the Opresion to Freedom Bill
MessageMoves healh care in the right direction but we'd prefer what it was before. Don't think much of the others but they are a lower priority to us.

Date10:49:25, February 28, 2008 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Opresion to Freedom Bill
MessageLP held the position of finance minister for 60-70 years. During that time we always had a surplus.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 421

no
  

Total Seats: 329

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62