We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reasonable Communications
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2126
Description[?]:
| Every resident of Lodamun should be able to afford a basic phone line, a connection to the outside world. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning phone services.
Old value:: There are no regulations on phone service.
Current: The state regulates the rates providers can charge for phone service.
Proposed: The state regulates the rates providers can charge for phone service.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:12:01, September 10, 2005 CET | From |  Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Reasonable Communications |
| Message | Is the government going to pay for it? How much will be charged? Will the price be enough to pay for the service? If the phone companies go bankrupt, they are unlikely to be able to provide their services for much longer. |
| Date | 04:19:32, October 15, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the Reasonable Communications |
| Message | Moved to a vote, about time. |
| Date | 07:01:40, October 15, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Reasonable Communications |
| Message | Not answering the feasability issues I see. |
| Date | 07:01:47, October 15, 2005 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Reasonable Communications |
| Message | Not answering the feasability issues I see. |
| Date | 15:37:16, October 15, 2005 CET | From | National People's Gang | To | Debating the Reasonable Communications |
| Message | Binocular vision? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 135 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 55 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 110 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation." - Thomas B. Reed |