We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Property Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Libertarian Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2110
Description[?]:
| Proposal |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent domain compensation (if eminent domain is legal).
Old value:: The government determines compensation for victims of eminent domain; victims can sue if they deem it unfair.
Current: The victim of eminent domain sets compensation, government can appeal to the courts if they deem the cost too high.
Proposed: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:14:56, September 11, 2005 CET | From | National Democratic Party | To | Debating the Property Act |
| Message | we agree |
| Date | 05:16:25, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Totalitarian Party | To | Debating the Property Act |
| Message | The current system works well. We see no reason to change it. |
| Date | 06:47:16, September 11, 2005 CET | From | National Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Property Act |
| Message | Why not have a fair and equal court decide the price of individual's property? |
| Date | 08:12:33, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Totalitarian Party | To | Debating the Property Act |
| Message | Because the current system is already fair. If the displaced persons feel the compensation is below the value of the land, they can sue. A neutral body would unnecessarily involve excess people in the process. |
| Date | 15:39:47, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Communist Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Property Act |
| Message | We agree with the Totalitarian Party. |
| Date | 17:58:53, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Gaduridos National Party | To | Debating the Property Act |
| Message | Sounds fair enough to use we will support |
| Date | 22:04:36, September 11, 2005 CET | From | National Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Property Act |
| Message | Why not skip the problems of sueing in the first place, by having a nuetral court decide Bringing to vote. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 267 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 132 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws. |
| Random quote: "Prejudices subsist in people's imagination long after they have been destroyed by their experience." - Ernest Dimnet |