We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reclaiming Communication for the Public Benefit 2538
Details
Submitted by[?]: Trabajo y Libertad
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2539
Description[?]:
Unregulated private communication industries provide an inferior service driven by profit, not the people's requirements. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Radio stations.
Old value:: All radio stations are private.
Current: All radio stations are owned by the state.
Proposed: The government subsidises independent non-profit-making cooperatives for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised radio stations are allowed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Television stations.
Old value:: All television media are private.
Current: All television stations are owned by the state.
Proposed: The government subsidises independent non-profit-making cooperatives for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised TV stations are allowed.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning phone services.
Old value:: There are no regulations on phone service.
Current: Telephone lines are provided free of charge to all citizens.
Proposed: Telephone lines are provided free of charge to all citizens.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: Only private post agencies exist, and the services they provide are unregulated.
Current: There is a nationalised post office agency in the nation. Private ones are banned.
Proposed: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:31:31, February 28, 2008 CET | From | Partido Santanderista | To | Debating the Reclaiming Communication for the Public Benefit 2538 |
Message | Art 2 - private post should not be prohibited. Agree with all the rest |
Date | 16:58:02, February 28, 2008 CET | From | Trabajo y Libertad | To | Debating the Reclaiming Communication for the Public Benefit 2538 |
Message | And if we changed this to having a nationalised post agency, alongside regulated private post services? |
Date | 18:50:16, February 28, 2008 CET | From | Partido Santanderista | To | Debating the Reclaiming Communication for the Public Benefit 2538 |
Message | full support |
Date | 19:28:02, February 28, 2008 CET | From | Partido Federalisto | To | Debating the Reclaiming Communication for the Public Benefit 2538 |
Message | Opposed to all articles. |
Date | 20:34:18, February 28, 2008 CET | From | Davostan Socialist People Party | To | Debating the Reclaiming Communication for the Public Benefit 2538 |
Message | ok to all |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 42 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 87 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 8 |
Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws. |
Random quote: "Seventy-seven percent of anti-abortion leaders are men. 100% of them will never be pregnant." - Planned Parenthood advertisement |