We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Organ Donation Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Papas Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2539
Description[?]:
| Change from Unless otherwise stated, consent is assumed. to proposed: Organ donations are legal with personal consent. Thant way it gives the individual the ability to choose what they do with their organs once they pass onto the next world |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning organ donations.
Old value:: Unless otherwise stated, consent is assumed.
Current: Organ donations are legal with personal consent.
Proposed: Organ donations are legal with personal consent.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 06:07:43, February 29, 2008 CET | From |  People's Radical Party | To | Debating the Organ Donation Bill |
| Message | The entire point of assumed consent is that it still does give the person the option to choose, but in cases where they haven't thought about it, the decision is made for them. The organs do nobody any good once the deceased is...well...deceased, and this current policy allows the squeamish to avoid any tough decisions and facing of their own mortality. |
| Date | 15:13:58, February 29, 2008 CET | From | Republican Coalition | To | Debating the Organ Donation Bill |
| Message | Agreement with the GPRP, the dead person does not need the organs. If they have something actually against the process then they will state so. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 123 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 376 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 251 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "Thousands of Zardic soldiers were sacrificed so that the Zardic government could gain control of a few buildings and Theodoro could pretend to be Augustus the Great. This is the kind of jingoistic ideology Zardugal would bring to the Security Council. They will throw countless lives away in pursuit of former glory." - Prince Akhaias, former Coburan royal |