Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5575
Next month in: 03:38:51
Server time: 12:21:08, November 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 2541

Details

Submitted by[?]: General Confederation of Labour

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2541

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:21:55, March 03, 2008 CET
FromGeneral Confederation of Labour
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2541
MessageI think the PFL will support this cabinet to take Okhranka and LNF out of our cabinet.

Date20:53:15, March 03, 2008 CET
FromPFL Irish Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2541
MessageIndeed. We much prefer this proposal. Especially now that we have finally got an important ministry (finance) and have been the leading PFL party for the last 2 elections.

Date22:20:48, March 03, 2008 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2541
MessageWe have a good, working cabinet. Why change it on behalf of some grubby power-grabbers?

Date22:23:53, March 03, 2008 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2541
MessageDWP would swap Health and Social Services and Education and Culture for Infrastructure and Transport?

AMSuD would trade the Justice, Science and Technology, and Trade and Industry for Defence, and Food and Transport?

This is desperate, PFL.

Date02:43:08, March 04, 2008 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2541
MessageWe have to say this is becoming a little ridiculous - this is... the third cabinet proposal of this term?

We have willingly taken any positions offered... we are always only too happy to represent the good People of Likatonia. But... well, this is making us feel like some kind of negotiable commodity. And we understand now what the DWP meant about feeling taken for granted.

Date20:22:08, March 04, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic Workers' Party and CTUL List
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2541
MessageIn theory we could have supported, had this not jeopardised our current good level of representation in the Cabinet. However, particularly with the AM SuDP set to oppose the proposal, our support would not only unwarranted but irrelevant.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 166

no
   

Total Seats: 362

abstain
  

Total Seats: 138


Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left.

Random quote: "Politics, when it is an art and a service, not an exploitation, is about acting for an ideal through realities." - Charles De Gaulle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72