We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Foreign alliances and treaties bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Socialist Party of Deltaria
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2110
Description[?]:
| Parties of mighty Deltaria, for those of you who may be unconvinced of the clear and present danger we face, may I direct your attention to the scheming machinatons happening within the Sultinate of Al'Badara http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=17747 http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=16286 The NSP finds this news to be wholly distressing, and proposes the following... Apon the election of a cabinet and foreign minister representative of the wishes of the Deltarian people, the following path of action should be taken. 1) Our foreign minister should attempt to implement friendly relations with our neighbours, the Cildanian Republic and Selucian Empire. Although the NSP does not expect them to help us, should warfare unfortunately befall our great nation, we consider it imperitive that we retard the insideous moral corruption the coalition of Islamic nations are attempting to exert over our neighbours. Assurances of neutrality from these nations will be invaluable. 2) Our foreign minister should attempt to implement friendly relations, hopefully leading to a mutual protection pact or alliance with the Aldurian Republic against the nation of Quanzar, a powerful and adequately militarised nation. As you know, the Quanzar Emirites lie directly between our two great Republics. Should the hateful aggression of the Emirites escalate into open warfare, the nation of Quanzar will be crushed between our armies. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:22:21, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Utilolibertarian Party | To | Debating the Foreign alliances and treaties bill |
| Message | If you look closely at the first bill, more parties are opposing it than supporting it. Furthermore, how do we know these nations harbor ill will against us? |
| Date | 18:28:29, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Utilolibertarian Party | To | Debating the Foreign alliances and treaties bill |
| Message | I withdraw my objections now that I understand what the Quanzar Emirates have done. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 100 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols. |
| Random quote: "Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it." - George Bernard Shaw |