We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Compromise Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Technocratic Nationalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2543
Description[?]:
| The recent objections made by the Dorvik Federal Party have made us realize that, in our pursuit of limited government, we have inadvertently given Dorvik's corporations a disproportionate and possibly excessive amount of power. Thus, for the first time in the hundred year history of the Technocratic Nationalist Party, we publically admit that we have acted in error. We hope that this bill will address the concerns of the DFP, and help restore positive relations between us. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers carry military-grade equipment.
Current: Police officers carry military-grade equipment.
Proposed: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:14:18, March 05, 2008 CET | From |  Dorvik Federal Party | To | Debating the Compromise Act |
| Message | The DFP finds that this bill, although not going far enough in the minds of the party's leaders; puts Dorvik back in compliance with Article 15 of the Anti-Fascism Treaty. The DFP shall re-analyze it's position concerning Dorvik Internal Policy and the TNP within the next year; which may include a major re-organization of internal leadership; a drawback of official condemnation; or a return to the old status-quo. |
| Date | 05:28:53, March 05, 2008 CET | From | Technocratic Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Compromise Act |
| Message | We are pleased to hear this! Although we will always be committed to privatization and the free market, we will take steps to ensure that the people of Dorvik do not suffer as a result of our actions. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 339 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 67 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 93 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom." - Friedrich Hayek |