Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 03:11:21
Server time: 04:48:38, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Invest in Telamon's Astronomy! (RRP

Details

Submitted by[?]: Rightful Radical Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2543

Description[?]:

We must explore space!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:02:38, March 07, 2008 CET
FromNew Telamon Party
ToDebating the Invest in Telamon's Astronomy! (RRP
Messageand just where are we going to get the money from for this?

Date18:55:52, March 07, 2008 CET
FromRightful Radical Party
ToDebating the Invest in Telamon's Astronomy! (RRP
MessageThe same place where you, John Smith, took all those money from new elections! Two early elections, do you know how much that costs? And you want even more new elections... Did anybody ask how much that costs?! If we have money for 3 early elections plus the upcoming ones, we have money for this, dear John Smith.

-- Vojislav Krkljus, Head of RRP

Date21:08:12, March 07, 2008 CET
FromConservative Ordo Malleus (COM)
ToDebating the Invest in Telamon's Astronomy! (RRP
MessageTelamon is focusing on problems at home. It is not engaging in problems with our terrestrial neighbors. Why would we wish to engage with problems beyond the stratosphere?
-Delphan Gruss, Minister of Science & Technology

Date22:27:44, March 08, 2008 CET
FromRightful Radical Party
ToDebating the Invest in Telamon's Astronomy! (RRP
MessageAnd why should we not is the question Mr Gruss, isn't it?

- Tomislav Crnobrnja, RRP

Date03:48:44, March 09, 2008 CET
FromConservative Ordo Malleus (COM)
ToDebating the Invest in Telamon's Astronomy! (RRP
MessageSir the question was rhetorical. I surely hope you were not educated by our illustrious public education system. The choice is clear. If we are concentrating on problems at home, we are, and if we are not engaging in problems with our terrestrial neighbors, we're not, then why would we wish to engage with problems beyond the stars? The answer, of course, is that we don't.
-Delphan Gruss, Minister of Science & Technology

Date10:33:11, March 09, 2008 CET
FromRightful Radical Party
ToDebating the Invest in Telamon's Astronomy! (RRP
MessageBUT, when we had all that money for 2 early elections and the one coming, and when we had all that money to make telephone lines free, why won't we do a little investment and become a world nation?

- Vojislav Krkljus, RRP

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 55

no
   

Total Seats: 554

abstain
 

Total Seats: 141


Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum.

Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57