We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: DSP.094.2543
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2543
Description[?]:
| Standardized testing is a very useful tool for determining the general intelligence development of individuals, however creativity is just as important. Current laws only further the creation of a society of drones who only learn how to work. We must change this to make sure all of our citizens are well rounded and intelligent individuals who are good problem solvers. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National Curriculum
Old value:: invalid choice
Current: There is a National Curriculum which all schools are obliged to follow.
Proposed: invalid choice
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 06:22:54, March 09, 2008 CET | From |  Conservative Party | To | Debating the DSP.094.2543 |
| Message | 1) experience is crucial. Majority of students will end up as part of the workforce. 2) "only learn to work" - standardised testing is 'discouraged', not eliminated 3) creativity is important, agreed - however it will come at the workplace as well. Motivation is higher when someone is doing a project that an end-user will use, instead of these "imagine if" projects at school. 4) "well rounded" - it's lacking practical experience => statement is false. 5) "creative" and "intelligent" have two separate meanings. One does not imply the other. Being around intelligent co-workers will increase your knowledge more rapidly than siding on a chair and doing Pūjā 6) problem solving techniques are learned on the job from more experienced co-workers We strongly oppose. OOC: This comes from personal experience of listening to university quacks (professors) teach you something they saw in a lab or experiment that can never be of practical use. That type of learning should be left for graduate/research studies level. Learning useful information is much more useful. |
| Date | 19:52:49, March 09, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the DSP.094.2543 |
| Message | OOC: Pūjā should say Puja (with accents on the u and the a) |
| Date | 11:06:42, March 10, 2008 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the DSP.094.2543 |
| Message | We'd prefer the other option than work based or creative based testing as a means of intelligence and educational based studies |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 94 | |||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 443 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 63 |
| Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640 |
| Random quote: "If sunbeams were weapons of war, we would have had solar energy centuries ago." - George Porter |