Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:09:31
Server time: 19:50:28, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Health and Safety Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party of Evil

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2111

Description[?]:

We propose to give local governments the right to set their own health and safety regulations in industry, since they are better able to judge the local situation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:25:59, September 12, 2005 CET
FromAlderdath Lebrali Demkratti
ToDebating the Health and Safety Act
Messagei feel this should be a national issue

Date18:03:33, September 12, 2005 CET
FromUnio enim si quis Motus Populi
ToDebating the Health and Safety Act
Messageabsoutly not. Businesses are national. Industry is nation. This is not somthing that should be left to local governments.

Date03:19:50, September 13, 2005 CET
FromFree Market Party
ToDebating the Health and Safety Act
MessageWe completely agree with this bill. We have much diversity within our nation, and a one-size-fits-all policy is problematic. Local governments must have the ability to create regulations that fit their economic situation.

Despite what the National Solidarity says, the majority of businesses are small, hire local workers, and serve a local clientele. It makes perfect sense to have regional governments regulate this area. Not just for the small, local businesses, but so that large, national businesses must conform to a community’s standards when they move in. It is unfair to create a single national standard and prohibit local governments from controlling the activities of national industries that move into their communities.

Date06:50:51, September 13, 2005 CET
FromCapitalist Freedom Party
ToDebating the Health and Safety Act
MessageHm. I could go either way to be honest.

Date06:58:40, September 13, 2005 CET
FromUnio enim si quis Motus Populi
ToDebating the Health and Safety Act
MessageAnd if local areas deem that fire doors and alarms are not needed?

As well, wouldn't it be more economical, for things such as major industries, to have uniform standards?

Date16:29:47, September 14, 2005 CET
FromParty of Evil
ToDebating the Health and Safety Act
MessageWe see your point, NS. Still, considering that all strategic industries are government-owned, we will still have some degree of centralisation, while allowing greater flexibility and adaptability to Kundrati's industries.

Date18:06:32, September 14, 2005 CET
FromUnio enim si quis Motus Populi
ToDebating the Health and Safety Act
MessageWe still see a problem with this. If Local governments decide that regulations should be lax, then it affects the workers. IF they decide to strong, then it huge amounts of money go into meeting those standards, and many small businesses won't be able to do it, leading to a hugh hit in local economies.

The Federal Government making the regulations is a happy medium.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 169

no
    

Total Seats: 136

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws.

Random quote: "We have a culture, a strong, vibrant, 'real' culture. Most of the outside world does not. They haven't bled enough for it." - Lászlo Nádašdy, former Deltarian nobleman

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68