We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 2546
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2547
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Bloc Libéral - Soldats du Kanjor
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Bloc Libéral - Soldats du Kanjor
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Union Pour Un Movement Populaire
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Parti Libertaire
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Bloc Libéral - Soldats du Kanjor
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the 2ème PPPP
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Union Pour Un Movement Populaire
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Union Pour Un Movement Populaire
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Union Pour Un Movement Populaire
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Union Pour Un Movement Populaire
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Parti Libertaire
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Bloc Libéral - Soldats du Kanjor
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Parti Libertaire
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:08:29, March 17, 2008 CET | From | Union Pour Un Movement Populaire | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2546 |
Message | Yeah whatever. |
Date | 04:57:21, March 17, 2008 CET | From | Parti Libertaire | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2546 |
Message | :( We like being head of government! |
Date | 23:53:45, March 17, 2008 CET | From | Bloc Libéral - Soldats du Kanjor | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2546 |
Message | No love for General Boisclair? |
Date | 00:14:58, March 18, 2008 CET | From | 2ème PPPP | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2546 |
Message | What did you want BL? Make your own proposal if this wasn't good enough for you. |
Date | 00:48:52, March 18, 2008 CET | From | Partie d'Isolationnisme | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2546 |
Message | It makes me feel left out. And angry. SO ANGRY |
Date | 01:38:14, March 18, 2008 CET | From | Union Pour Un Movement Populaire | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2546 |
Message | PI, I apologize. From the depths of my cold black dying heart. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 206 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 209 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 85 |
Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |