Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5473
Next month in: 03:32:42
Server time: 12:27:17, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: CP.0062.2547 Mandatory Military/National Service Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2557

Description[?]:

50-week service in total. Weeks not required to be completed consecutively. Must be completely between the recruitment age (minimum) and maximum age (of 40 years old). Higher ranking personnel must serve longer terms, according to rank.

Recruitment is done at age of adult in Sekowo. Mandatory for men, voluntary for women.

Recruit may postpone serving due to school for up to 4 years.

All recruits must undergo a physical and mental evaluation before serving. Recruit may request exemption from serving due to medical reasons. Service exemptions will be handled by the Sekowan Military and National Service Exemption Board (S.M.A.N.S.E.B.)

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:22:24, March 18, 2008 CET
From Revolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the CP.0062.2547 Mandatory Military/National Service Bill
MessageWe support.

Date16:23:06, March 18, 2008 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the CP.0062.2547 Mandatory Military/National Service Bill
MessageWe do not support.

We however would support civil service, however we do not support inscription in any way.

Date20:06:22, March 18, 2008 CET
From Independence Coalition
ToDebating the CP.0062.2547 Mandatory Military/National Service Bill
MessageWe will not stand for any form of conscription.

Date04:30:30, March 19, 2008 CET
From Normand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the CP.0062.2547 Mandatory Military/National Service Bill
Message[[How did I vote on this bill last time? I've honestly forgotten]]

Date14:09:20, March 19, 2008 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the CP.0062.2547 Mandatory Military/National Service Bill
MessageOOC: NPP, you voted for no civilian service. http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=178752

Date18:02:31, March 19, 2008 CET
From Normand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the CP.0062.2547 Mandatory Military/National Service Bill
Message[[Well, I should probably vote no again for consistency. = ]]

Date03:33:44, March 23, 2008 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the CP.0062.2547 Mandatory Military/National Service Bill
MessageOOC: Probably, you ungrateful person. Not even wanted to volunteer for your elders. Shame shame. =P

Date03:15:52, March 24, 2008 CET
From Sekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the CP.0062.2547 Mandatory Military/National Service Bill
MessageI believe there's an option that allows all to serve in the military or civil service without penalty for either choice. It is preferred.

Date14:52:43, March 25, 2008 CET
From Free Democratic Party
ToDebating the CP.0062.2547 Mandatory Military/National Service Bill
MessageWe are against mandatory national service.

Date18:41:02, April 01, 2008 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the CP.0062.2547 Mandatory Military/National Service Bill
MessageSCP, I believe that's the option already presented. "at their option".

Date18:00:47, April 05, 2008 CET
From Sekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the CP.0062.2547 Mandatory Military/National Service Bill
MessageCP, I could have sworn there was one where the military and civil service paid equivalent amounts.

Date04:40:36, April 07, 2008 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the CP.0062.2547 Mandatory Military/National Service Bill
MessageIt's not one of the options listed. I don't know.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 141

no
     

Total Seats: 344

abstain
 

Total Seats: 96


Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position.

Random quote: "Thousands of Zardic soldiers were sacrificed so that the Zardic government could gain control of a few buildings and Theodoro could pretend to be Augustus the Great. This is the kind of jingoistic ideology Zardugal would bring to the Security Council. They will throw countless lives away in pursuit of former glory." - Prince Akhaias, former Coburan royal

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 83