We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Professional Retirement Age
Details
Submitted by[?]: People's Radical Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2549
Description[?]:
Forcing our leading minds to retire comparatively early in life appears counterproductive: |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 65
Current: 60
Proposed: 70
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:25:38, March 20, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the Professional Retirement Age |
Message | We will support this move provided that the details of the law allow people to retire earlier (but on a lower pension) if they wish. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 601 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 149 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites.'" - Larry Hardiman |