Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 03:32:57
Server time: 00:27:02, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): slon03 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Defensive Treaty

Details

Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2553

Description[?]:

A Lodamun party sent a message to the JUP asking us to ratify http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=300 . I put it to the Council in the interests of debate.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:58:15, March 21, 2008 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Defensive Treaty
MessageWe feel we should not ratify it. We should remain neutral in this conflict, not taking one side or the other. If we did so, it would undermine the peace process taking place on our soil.

Date00:36:08, March 22, 2008 CET
FromTuatha Dé Danann
ToDebating the Defensive Treaty
MessageWe also recommend not ratifying this. However we do feel that we need to point out that Lodamun is a member of the NATO and thus we would actually take a side if we agreed on the other bill, since only Lodamun is a member and it's adversary is not.

Altough, when we dissolve the neutrality treaty we currently have, it would open up more options.

Date02:41:49, March 22, 2008 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Defensive Treaty
MessageNO!! This treaty will violate the Tukarali Neutrality Act. As such, this treaty must be abandoned at once by the JUP

Date13:28:30, March 22, 2008 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Defensive Treaty
MessageWe're going to oppose this as well

Date14:14:25, March 22, 2008 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Defensive Treaty
MessageLikatonia has been a member of NATO for over 300 years....

Date20:30:10, March 22, 2008 CET
FromTuatha Dé Danann
ToDebating the Defensive Treaty
MessageYeah we didn't see that one, we apoligise.

Date14:19:12, March 23, 2008 CET
FromTuatha Dé Danann
ToDebating the Defensive Treaty
MessageDue to the recent exploits of Likatonia we have changed our view towards this and feel that we should deliberate a possible agreement. They have shown an utter disrespect towards human rights and life itself.

Date07:48:12, March 28, 2008 CET
FromJudicial Union Party
ToDebating the Defensive Treaty
MessageWell this has got little support. Let's get it off the table. Vote for how you would vote on the actual treaty.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
          

    Total Seats: 382

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 118


    Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731

    Random quote: "Colonialism or imperialism, as the slave system of the West is called, is not something that is just confined to England or France or the United States. The interests in this country are in cahoots with the interests in France and the interests in Britain. It's one huge complex or combine, and it creates what's known not as the American power structure or the French power structure, but an international power structure. This international power structure is used to suppress the masses of dark-skinned people all over the world and exploit them of their natural resources." Malcolm X

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 64