We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 2549
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2550
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Fig Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Fig Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Fig Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Fig Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Fig Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Fig Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Fig Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Fig Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Fig Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Fig Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Fig Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Fig Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Fig Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:57:11, March 23, 2008 CET | From | Eco-Situationist Psychogeographers | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2549 |
| Message | "What is the meaning of your party's decision to not include the other parties within the cabinet?" --Right. Honourable Timotheus Aurelius, Chairman of the Imperial-Royalist Party |
| Date | 02:37:19, March 23, 2008 CET | From | Socialist Workers Party of Keymon | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2549 |
| Message | "It is authorotarianism. If the Fig Party does not reconsider their proposal, our party policy will be to never form a government with the Fig Party as this is a sign of authorotarianism and our party does not cooperate with that or undemocratic processes which has been present under this regime." -William Bedford, Chairman of the SWPK |
| Date | 21:13:26, March 23, 2008 CET | From | Fig Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2549 |
| Message | See the message center on the Grand Duchy page. We have tried numerous times to form a cabinet. We are tired of trying. |
| Date | 06:48:04, March 24, 2008 CET | From | Socialist Workers Party of Keymon | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2549 |
| Message | Well say no and at least propose one with parties that have been serving this nation for the longest time, myself, the Figs, Imperial Royalists, and the Liberals, we have been here for a long time and there would be an assurance that we would not leave. However you could include the RC Party as well if you like, it's not like we can submit our ideas anyway (no one else can make a cabinet proposal). -William Bedford, Chairman of the SWPK |
| Date | 16:34:55, March 24, 2008 CET | From | Fig Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2549 |
| Message | You are submitting your ideas in this format. We gave all parties the chance to express their ideas as to which positions they would like, and we met those requests. We also said that this would be the last attempt at a partisan cabinet. Your party was the only one to vote against the proposal, no matter what your reasons may be. Your party made a decision, and it affected all parties of Keymon. |
| Date | 20:11:45, March 24, 2008 CET | From | Socialist Workers Party of Keymon | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2549 |
| Message | Haha we make no descisions when we have a 121 seat legislature occupied by a party with 120 of them. We have one seat we make almost no desicsions here. We voted against fraud parties and unfair proposals, if you would of heeded our words and act as the responsible party you are supposed to be it would of not have been diffficult to create a multi-party Cabinet. -William Bedford, Chairman of the SWPK |
| Date | 14:24:20, March 25, 2008 CET | From | Fig Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2549 |
| Message | If you would have voted yes, it would have created a multiparty cabinet. It was your decision to vote no. |
| Date | 07:20:34, March 26, 2008 CET | From | Socialist Workers Party of Keymon | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2549 |
| Message | Wow unbelievable did you understand a word I just said? |
| Date | 13:57:23, March 26, 2008 CET | From | Fig Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2549 |
| Message | Yes, you were wrong though in what you said. A multiparty system was not created not because we didnt head your words. |
| Date | 19:46:08, March 27, 2008 CET | From | Socialist Workers Party of Keymon | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2549 |
| Message | We have a multiparty system now thanks to constitutionally sanctioned elections with no thanks to your parties gratudity in granting the people elections to stay in power for a couple years longer. But on the others you were tyring to get us to vote no so you could give an excuse you could excluded us and included the other parties, however you wanted all the power to yourself. Well this debate is over and in the end we scored a victory and pretty soon either ourselves or another party are going to be in power and myself and I urge other parties not to indlude this treacherous party for quite a long time in any proposals. |
| Date | 15:39:50, March 28, 2008 CET | From | Fig Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2549 |
| Message | We are sorry that you feel that way. Is gratudity a word? |
| Date | 19:44:02, March 28, 2008 CET | From | Socialist Workers Party of Keymon | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2549 |
| Message | I smelled it wrong its gratuity. If theres anymore words you would like to pick out and play speak and spell with then theres a webster's dictionary website. You could take them there. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 120 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 1 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated. |
| Random quote: "Man is by nature a political animal." - Aristotle |