Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 02:24:56
Server time: 21:35:03, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (8): ADM Drax | dannypk19 | Dx6743 | HopesFor | JourneyJak | Paulo Nogueira | R Drax | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Name Change (2nd Option)

Details

Submitted by[?]: General Confederation of Labour

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2551

Description[?]:

The PCA proposes a national name without organisation names to stop the conflict between AM and PFL and that is an option between the unitary republic and the confederacy: "The Federal Republic of Likatonia"

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:46:52, March 24, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic National Party
ToDebating the Name Change (2nd Option)
MessageAgreed.

Date22:52:02, March 24, 2008 CET
FromOkhranka
ToDebating the Name Change (2nd Option)
MessageFar too dull.

Date01:48:55, March 25, 2008 CET
FromThe Counsel of The People's Movement
ToDebating the Name Change (2nd Option)
MessageAs a Foreign Minister I would Suggest.

The Regions of the Republics of the Likatonia.

Date01:50:25, March 25, 2008 CET
FromThe Counsel of The People's Movement
ToDebating the Name Change (2nd Option)
MessageThis makes the nation sound Civil and Controlled even if you split in up in cultures the names makes it sound like many nations joined together to form. Just a suggestion.

Date17:09:46, March 25, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic Workers' Party and CTUL List
ToDebating the Name Change (2nd Option)
MessageWe see no merit in normalising the name of Likatonia.

Date19:35:12, March 25, 2008 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Name Change (2nd Option)
MessageWe totally agree with the PCPoI, and thank them for their input.

There's no point emasculating Likatonian history for a tepid title.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 292

no
    

Total Seats: 310

abstain
 

Total Seats: 64


Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map.

Random quote: "We live in a world in which politics has replaced philosophy." - Martin L. Gross

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62