We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Food Safety Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Populist Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2111
Description[?]:
Whereas, we note sadly that shelf lives on food are not enforced in Kanjor, and Whereas, we feel that is detrimental to the health of residents, We hereby propose enforcing shelf lives of foods throughout Kanjor. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Licensing of food sales.
Old value:: Food may be sold by licensed vendors only.
Current: The licensing of food sale is left for local governments to decide.
Proposed: Food may be sold by licensed vendors only, and shelf lives of foods are enforced.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:59:55, September 14, 2005 CET | From | Populist Liberal Party | To | Debating the Food Safety Act |
Message | No to enforcing shelf lives? So stores should be able to sell unsafe groceries? We would hope that position might be reconsidered. |
Date | 18:44:52, September 14, 2005 CET | From | Kanjoran People's Party | To | Debating the Food Safety Act |
Message | Popular Liberal Party, we have a ethical code that demands all bills be given proper time for debate (about a day) before being put up for a vote. |
Date | 18:59:04, September 14, 2005 CET | From | Populist Liberal Party | To | Debating the Food Safety Act |
Message | ...as I'll try to follow more closely, as I said in response to your message. This was actually up for debate for about half a day, although it was the half that most Americans were sleeping. Nevertheless, I'll try to follow that rule more closely and recognize that it should be close to a day. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 220 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 97 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 123 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall." - Confucius |