We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sturdy Oak Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free Bibs Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2553
Description[?]:
| The federal government already has its fingers in too many private sector pies. It makes fiscal sense for logging companies to plant more trees; without new trees, there won't be any left to cut down. Why regulate a common sense issue? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Current: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Proposed: The government does not intervene with regard to the replantation of trees.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:24:28, March 28, 2008 CET | From | Dorvik People's Liberation Party | To | Debating the Sturdy Oak Act |
| Message | More bush league science from the TNP. Would you have our country stripped bare of its trees? Our rivers muddied by erosion caused by deforestation? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 262 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 237 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker). |
| Random quote: "No government has the right to tell its citizens when or whom to love. The only queer people are those who don't love anybody." - Rita Mae Brown |