Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 02:22:17
Server time: 05:37:42, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Secularist & Religious Devolution Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2555

Description[?]:

We believe that the federal government should treat religions as companies, and should have less control over them. We think that religion should be devolved to local government policy, and religions should be regulated and taxed.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:01:14, March 31, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic Capitalist Delegation
ToDebating the Secularist & Religious Devolution Act
MessageWe the DCD cannot support this bill because of Articles II, III, IV, and V.

We veiw Articles II and V as inappropriately invasive. Our standpoint is that no curch, for profit or not, should be subject to undue regulations that would be forced upon no other private business or institution.

We cannot support article III as it would mean the strict regulation of a private institution. Although we recognize the role of the government to regulate public institutions, those which are privately funded and operated shall not be subject to strict regulations of any government.

We cannot support Article IV unconditionally as most curches are non-profit organizations and should not be subject to the same taxation laws as private for-profit businesses.

We strongly urge our close partners the LSD party to stand down from their aggressive attacks on religious institutions.

James Lott
Chairman
Democratic Capitalist Delegation

Date07:37:29, April 01, 2008 CET
FromConservative Ordo Malleus (COM)
ToDebating the Secularist & Religious Devolution Act
MessageWe cannot support this bill because of its articles. The proposed changes to Telamon's stance on religion are both unnecessary and despicable.
-Roger Evars, COM Party Leader

Date17:20:10, April 01, 2008 CET
FromRadical Party
ToDebating the Secularist & Religious Devolution Act
MessageWe would support this legislation, but section 4 sets a socialistic precedent that the government can tax any body in the name of the 'greater good'.

Saying that, we support its secularist aims.

- Kristian Donson - Leader of the Radical Party

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
      

Total Seats: 250

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility.

Random quote: "What is conservatism? Is it not the adherence to the old and tried against the new and untried?" - Abraham Lincoln

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 74